That aside, the idea that you can finance life in the highest cost living areas of the USA as a “stylist” (picking items for a clothing subscription) is lunacy. Clearly that work can be done anywhere and it’s only a matter of time till it’s pushed to the lowest cost areas. I wouldn’t be surprised if the cost of such labor goes to near zero as they attempt to start “paying” people with publicity instead.
It's in quotes with an inline description because, while it's the actual job title for the positions in question, it's also a common English word that in most circles would refer to a "hair stylist".
Ascribing negative intentions to minor punctuation and making up biographies about your fellow commentators says more about your bad taste and biases than mine.
I suppose you think it’s lunacy that hair dressers think they can live in the city as well.
To think that less than 4 months ago People were ridiculing Andrew Yang and other proponents of UBI. I admit having it be, initially anyway, State sanctioned bothers me a great deal; but the fact is gainful employment is no longer a reliable aspect of modern Life for many in Society. This will continue to cut deeper and deeper, and for anyone not paying attention these protests and riots in the US have a much deeper sense of resentment than just Police Brutality against black males. And it's felt throughout the spectrum of underemployed, highly indebted underclass. Its like the bottled and pent up anger from the Occupy movement coming back.
In many ways this reminds me of the London Riots of 2011, when London police killed a young black male named Mark Duggan [1] and it exposed a myriad of sociological, and socio-economic issues that quite frankly still remain to this day.
1: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/three-riot-lesson...