> Following the search, the City Officers gave Appellants an inventory sheet stating that they seized approximately $50,000 from Appellants’ properties. Appellants alleged, however, that the officers actually seized $151,380 in cash and another $125,000 in rare coins.
If the receipt was fraudulent, as is alleged here, I don't see how the seizure could be legal.
Re:As Qualified Immunity Takes Center Stage, More Delay from...
by vageli on Monday June 01, 2020 @04:11PM
(#23383172)
They even went so far as to falsify an inventory. Why would they go to that trouble if they believed their conduct was lawful? In my view this supports an allegation of wrongdoing.
> Following the search, the City Officers gave Appellants an inventory sheet stating that they seized approximately $50,000 from Appellants’ properties. Appellants alleged, however, that the officers actually seized $151,380 in cash and another $125,000 in rare coins.
If the receipt was fraudulent, as is alleged here, I don't see how the seizure could be legal.