Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at protests

Re:Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at... by derhuerst on Sunday May 31, 2020 @06:38PM (#23373551)

I opened https://github.com/everestpipkin/image-scrubber/issues/5 to discuss how to encourage people to use this tool responsibly. Please contribute your knowledge!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at... by nkbrd on Sunday May 31, 2020 @07:18PM (#23373909)

Do you really think that altered in any way images without any exif can hold someone accountable? Even videos can not be trusted nowadays.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at... by bigiain on Sunday May 31, 2020 @11:33PM (#23375269)

We know leo uses parallel construction.

Even images without chain of evidence reliability might get you on "a list"...

Do you reckon cops invited to "run wild" with clearview ai _AREN'T_ gonna be running protester photos through it to see who to "profile"?

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanmac/clearview-ai-co...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at... by bigiain on Sunday May 31, 2020 @11:39PM (#23375298)

Even being fairly familiar with deepfakes, I would very much prefer to avoid having to defend myself in court against prosecutors claiming to have "video evidence" of me murdering someone...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at... by CameronNemo on Sunday May 31, 2020 @07:29PM (#23374002)

AIUI this is mainly to be used by news publications, which need to continuously build their credibility regardless, rather than as evidence in a courtroom.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Image Scrubber: tool for anonymizing photographs taken at... by heavyset_go on Sunday May 31, 2020 @09:44PM (#23374811)

Yes. There is a very low bar to pass to convince a jury that a defendent is guilty. 99% conviction rates should scare you.

[ Parent | on HN ]