- he’s technical enough so that he actually understands what he’s doing (unlike a “non-technical cofounder”)
- working on actually inspiring projects (unlike “let’s sell ads” Google, “let’s make rich people richer” finance, “no innovation” Boeing or “Instagram for dogs” bullshit startups)
- he’s rich enough to be able to start his own company with extremely capable people, with less need to please the investors (at least in the short term)
- he’s actually driven, not just money/power-hungry like 99% of billionaires who use their wealth to buy goodwill/influence/art.
How so? Tesla spends a tiny bit of revenue on R&D and a solid chunk of that is on "research" grants that get converted to manufacturing grants (e.g. the NY plant).
See: https://ir.tesla.com/static-files/bbc6e137-897a-4543-857a-59...
Don't get me wrong, I guess there could be research spending elsewhere since Tesla is notoriously bad at financial reporting (e.g. the only company in history to double its factory count without increasing OpEx, or the only company in history to build a factory with zero CapEx spending), but I'm curious what the "extremely focused" claim is backed by.
Established companies have an expectation of success if they just keep doing what they are doing, so anything new is an unacceptable risk.
He seems to be able to benefit from the resources of a big company, while at the same time keep the fresh mindset of a relatively small company.
An actual non-monetary goal is what's missing, IMO, for most companies.
Money is more of a general goal, like happiness. Hard to stay focused.
Also Tesla seems to be extremely focused on r&d.
How does Elon Musk push and run his organisations so differently that he seems to be one of the only few, if not only one, capable of running big organisations that are able to accomplish this extreme level of innovation paired with tangible results?