News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Am I the longest-serving programmer – 57 years an... by SonOfLilit on Sunday May 31, 2020 @12:53PM (#23370767)
Huh, what do you know.

Still, this is unforgivable in my book:

  [] + {} == "[object Object]"
  {} + [] == 0
Re:Ask HN: Am I the longest-serving programmer – 57 years an... by kmill on Sunday May 31, 2020 @01:25PM (#23370992)
For the first, I frequently (for my own projects) change the Array prototype to have

   Array.prototype.toString = function () {
      return '[' + this.join(', ') + ']';
   };
It would be convenient if Object.prototype.toString by default threw an exception, since the default breaks the embedding rule I described.

The second example is misleading, and it has nothing to do with the rules for addition: the {} at the beginning of the expression is parsed as a code block, played off the rules for what the value of a Javascript statement is. More realistically, we have

   ({}) + [] == "[object Object]"
but the original is, effectively,

   {
   }
   console.log(+[]);
Re:Ask HN: Am I the longest-serving programmer – 57 years an... by SonOfLilit on Sunday May 31, 2020 @02:53PM (#23371678)
I didn't realise about the second one. Thanks!
Re:Ask HN: Am I the longest-serving programmer – 57 years an... by skykooler on Monday June 01, 2020 @12:10PM (#23380054)
Thanks, I never realized that the second one was parsed as a code block rather than an object!