News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Oracle vs. PostgreSQL – A Comment by dataminded on Saturday May 30, 2020 @02:33PM (#23363440)
Obviously you don't have experience with Oracle or you would have written millions of dollars in license fees... /s
Re:Oracle vs. PostgreSQL – A Comment by acdha on Saturday May 30, 2020 @02:41PM (#23363506)
Funny story: I worked at a place which spent millions annually with Oracle. They had a couple hours downtime every day because they couldn’t afford the online backup product.

This was an Ivy League university with an endowment in the tens of billions.

Re:Oracle vs. PostgreSQL – A Comment by miahi on Saturday May 30, 2020 @03:38PM (#23363939)
This is not true. There is no separate licensing for archivelog mode (the single thing that is needed for online backups).
Re:Oracle vs. PostgreSQL – A Comment by acdha on Saturday May 30, 2020 @03:51PM (#23364042)
That may be the case now but it was either different back then or neither their Oracle-trained DBAs nor their Oracle consultants was aware of it.

I was working with an even worse Oracle product (Hyperion) which had a convoluted homegrown script restarting all of the services on a number of servers to work around their inability to reliably handle database connection failures lasting more than a short interval. Before do that, they’d tried to get rid of the backup window but were told that wasn’t possible unless they could come up with a large amount of money for the license.