News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Analysis of 200M tweets discussing coronavirus suggests 45%-60% come from bots. Parent comment

Re:Analysis of 200M tweets discussing coronavirus suggests 4... by throwaway_pdp09 on Saturday May 30, 2020 @02:21PM (#23363344)
There are literally no claims in your original post that can be verified.

It's all subjective anger and whatnot. What am I or anyone supposed to take away from that?

> ample evidence that they're lying: again

Ok, what evidence. And don't tell me to google it or I can find it if I want to. You claim, you cite.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Analysis of 200M tweets discussing coronavirus suggests 4... by MrTuna_Man on Saturday May 30, 2020 @08:53PM (#23366245)
> There are literally no claims in your original post that can be verified.

> You claim, you cite.

If a claim cannot be verified, it is not a claim per se: it's an opinion.

[ Parent | on HN ]