News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GPT-3: A Disappointing Paper? by ideals on Saturday May 30, 2020 @12:57PM (#23362561)
> As a human being...

I know I'm cherry picking your post, sorry, but this line kinda stood out to me as funny but intriguing.

Doesn't something like this go without saying? Or is GPT-3 advanced enough that we must now distinguish ourselves from the robots and the dogs?

Re:GPT-3: A Disappointing Paper? by bondarchuk on Saturday May 30, 2020 @01:04PM (#23362630)
Increase your context window ;)

> But as an NLP academic researcher

It is in opposition to that.

Re:GPT-3: A Disappointing Paper? by spion on Sunday June 07, 2020 @10:42PM (#23453095)
This hints at there being non-humans doing NLP research at the moment.