News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Analysis of 200M tweets discussing coronavirus suggests 45%-60% come from bots. Parent comment

Re:Analysis of 200M tweets discussing coronavirus suggests 4... by herval on Saturday May 30, 2020 @12:50PM (#23362496)
None of these claims is real. “shadowbanning” doesnt exist, and that has been proven many times over. They also don’t remove any content that doesn’t infringe the TOS. This “valley ideology” nonsense is pure propaganda.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Analysis of 200M tweets discussing coronavirus suggests 4... by mcfly1985 on Saturday May 30, 2020 @01:14PM (#23362729)
> None of these claims is real.

Dude, you can’t even form a grammatically correct sentence.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Analysis of 200M tweets discussing coronavirus suggests 4... by herval on Saturday May 30, 2020 @01:28PM (#23362873)
You should go back to Blind or 4chan. Better places for that kind of discourse than hackernews.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Analysis of 200M tweets discussing coronavirus suggests 4... by mcfly1985 on Saturday May 30, 2020 @01:33PM (#23362927)
Your original comment added nothing of value. Everyone on hn is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points.
[ Parent | on HN ]