News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Analysis of 200M tweets discussing coronavirus suggests 4... by rtpg on Saturday May 30, 2020 @10:31AM (#23361446)
It's twitter, not people's healthcare.

Just put in a super basic unlock process that is costly to game for "non-real" people

Re:Analysis of 200M tweets discussing coronavirus suggests 4... by naasking on Saturday May 30, 2020 @10:37AM (#23361475)
> Just put in a super basic arbitration process that is costly to game for "non-real" people

I think your "just" is hand-waving away a lot of complexity. A person deployed these bots, and if a bot account gets put into an arbitration process, that person can go through the process themselves to pass the arbitration, then set the bot running again.

Re:Analysis of 200M tweets discussing coronavirus suggests 4... by vntok on Saturday May 30, 2020 @12:04PM (#23362054)
> that person can go through the process themselves to pass the arbitration, then set the bot running again.

That is not scalable, which is exactly the point.

Re:Analysis of 200M tweets discussing coronavirus suggests 4... by naasking on Saturday May 30, 2020 @12:16PM (#23362168)
It's far more scalable than the arbitration process itself. Arbitration will never win such an arms race.