edit: why the downvote? It states explicitly that the license is only granted as long as its requirements (T&Cs) are upheld. Which seem obvious to me, assuming the license does have conditions?

Though I guess it's less obvious to the legal profession as the MPL has a similarly explicit clause (5.1, and 5.2 also terminates the license if you initiate patent infringement litigation against "against any entity", which seems oddly broad)