Re:But no, 80-column terminals in 2020 isn't “reasonable” an...
by vlovich123 on Friday May 29, 2020 @07:32PM
(#23356858)
Is there any research to suggest that reading legibility of code is the same as for regular text? Unlike regular text code often has special characters & indentation to break it up, so intuitively I would assume it could support longer line lengths.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:But no, 80-column terminals in 2020 isn't “reasonable” an...
by stock_toaster on Saturday May 30, 2020 @12:45AM
(#23358547)
Yeah, we cant forget whitespace (indenting, space alignment, etc).
In a 100 char wide code line, how many actual non-whitespace chars would there be on average?
Re:But no, 80-column terminals in 2020 isn't “reasonable” an...
by chipotle_coyote on Friday May 29, 2020 @07:52PM
(#23357023)
I was wondering the same thing, yes. I'm often an annoying stickler about keeping line length for text on the web set to what a couple centuries of book design have taught us makes long-form prose more readable, but code is not prose. I try to keep multi-line comments wrapped to around 78 characters, but I'm not really too worried about code.
(This invites a rant about people, usually people who use Emacs, who put hard line breaks in text paragraphs, but I'll save it for another time.)