News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for “glorifying violence” by hnarn on Friday May 29, 2020 @10:19AM (#23350235)
Everyone is on board with each private platforms freedom to choose its content until it goes against their personal opinions: then, all of a sudden, the spaces of privately owned corporations are instead treated as if they belong to the public.

Net neutrality is important, because the digital infrastructure of the Internet is the "streets" of the digital world. Freedom of speech needs to be protected there, but when you're signing up for a free-of-charge social network that survives on advertising, you are literally soapboxing in a Walmart -- and it can't possibly be the civic duty of this metaphorical corporation to allow you to stay in there and disturb their business, rather than redirect you out into the street, or into your own place of business.

Re:Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for “glorifying violence” by ashtonkem on Friday May 29, 2020 @12:29PM (#23352061)
Net neutrality was never about the application layer, it was about the ISP layer.
Re:Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for “glorifying violence” by hnarn on Friday May 29, 2020 @01:15PM (#23352677)
I’m not sure where I insinuated anything about net neutrality being about the application layer? In fact I said the complete opposite.
Re:Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for “glorifying violence” by scoopdewoop on Friday May 29, 2020 @10:42AM (#23350449)
How about this for neutrality: When Joe Biden or Bernie Sanders end a post with "the shooting starts", they can get flagged for glorifying violence as well.
Re:Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet for “glorifying violence” by hnarn on Friday May 29, 2020 @01:15PM (#23352681)
What does flagging posts on social media have to do with net neutrality? Nothing.