Re:Deaths per unit of energy for various sources
by cromulent on Wednesday March 16, 2011 @04:34PM
(#2333770)
His point has little to do with bananas and much to do with the danger of radiation and how it is commonly attributed to nuclear power plants rather than coal.
Here is an example of someone else making the same point:
http://www.ornl.gov/info/ornlreview/rev26-34/text/colmain.ht...
Re:Deaths per unit of energy for various sources
by dexen on Wednesday March 16, 2011 @04:31PM
(#2333754)
You are right about the facts. And perhaps that's a non-point on well-educated HN. But the general public seems to be under-appreciating the pervasiveness of natural radiation, and freaking out about any nuclear contraptions. In some countries you can't even import those glowing tritium keychains :-(
Hence, the biggest non point I've ever seen in my life. Unless coal is actually radioactive to a noteworthy significantly-more-than-a-banana extent, which I probably would have heard of by now (not that I haven't been wrong before).