News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Trump threatens to 'close' down social media platforms by dragonwriter on Wednesday May 27, 2020 @11:30PM (#23333088)
> Attaching a disclaimer to the speech of another though is not straightforward.

From a free speech perspective, it's straightforward, private parties can choose to relay (or not) whatever viewpoints they want, and can choose to relay those viewpoints with or without commentary.

From a “what’s an ideal policy” perspective, maybe it's not, but “your policy is not ideal” isn't an exception to free speech justifying government intervention.

> How can they even be impartial

Private actors aren't required to be impartial. In fact, the whole premise of the marketplace of ideas is that private parties will be partial in choosing which ideas to present and how to present them.

Re:Trump threatens to 'close' down social media platforms by AnthonyMouse on Thursday May 28, 2020 @03:25AM (#23334465)
> In fact, the whole premise of the marketplace of ideas is that private parties will be partial in choosing which ideas to present and how to present them.

The issue is that a few giant corporations have got a cartel going. It's really an antitrust problem which is only a speech problem because the market is the marketplace of ideas.