News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on C, The Beautiful Language. Parent comment

Re:C, The Beautiful Language by dexen on Tuesday March 15, 2011 @02:46PM (#2328829)
Indeed, you are right about Scheme (and Arc). Thanks for the correction.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:C, The Beautiful Language by eru on Tuesday March 15, 2011 @08:39PM (#2330157)
Sure, no problem. I guess Emacs Lisp falls under the old-and-broken category. And Picolisp eschews functions as a data-type by choice. Do you know whether Picolisp offers lexical scoping?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:C, The Beautiful Language by dexen on Wednesday March 16, 2011 @03:41AM (#2331208)
As the other response says. The FAQ provides some rationale & makes it clear you can, actually, build robust software with picolisp's model of scoping. My understanding is, ``dynamic scoping is faster for an interpreter'' and ``funarg is easy to avoid and closures are possible''.

See the three following points:

http://www.software-lab.de/doc/faq.html#dynamic

http://www.software-lab.de/doc/faq.html#problems

http://www.software-lab.de/doc/faq.html#closures

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:C, The Beautiful Language by akkartik on Tuesday March 15, 2011 @08:46PM (#2330175)
It offers something similar-but-not-quite called transient symbols: http://www.software-lab.de/doc/faq.html#problems

Alternative phrases for similar-but-not-quite: insidious, error-prone.

[ Parent | on HN ]