News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tell HN: Interviewed with Triplebyte? Your profile is abo... by prepend on Saturday May 23, 2020 @09:35AM (#23282803)
The rhetorical technique that annoys me the most plays out like this...

Me: Thing You: I hate that thing Me: You don’t understand Thing. Here’s Thing explained. You: I understand Thing, I still hate it. Me: You don’t understand Thing. When you understand it, you’ll like it. (Repeat)

Sometimes this is stupidity thinking that understanding is missing, but I think it’s usually shady just so they have something to say to counter the objection that is visible to people outside the conversation, who are interested, and at least see some form of technical interaction.

Re:Tell HN: Interviewed with Triplebyte? Your profile is abo... by rurp on Saturday May 23, 2020 @03:18PM (#23285590)
There needs to be a catchy name for this type of interaction. I loathe it as well and it's annoyingly common. Companies that rely on this behavior should be called out repeatedly.
Re:Tell HN: Interviewed with Triplebyte? Your profile is abo... by prepend on Sunday May 24, 2020 @08:52AM (#23291145)
Willful misunderstanding? Confusion redirect? Defray to diffuse?

The technique seems super common now, and I’ve been expecting to run into it in some communications training, but haven’t yet.

I feel like there’s some crisis PR tactics this fits into that involves “Never disagree, redirect and ignore.” It diffuses criticism and makes it hard to argue.

It seems related to when I see a complaint on a review site that’s been responded to with “I’m the manager, please call me.” It doesn’t resolve the issue, but it shows that someone is doing something, so it diffuses pile on because it stops complaints of ignoring customers.

Re:Tell HN: Interviewed with Triplebyte? Your profile is abo... by executesorder66 on Wednesday May 27, 2020 @03:15AM (#23320284)
There is already a name for this type of interaction. It's called sales.
Re:Tell HN: Interviewed with Triplebyte? Your profile is abo... by iovrthoughtthis on Friday May 29, 2020 @07:28AM (#23348703)
I have found that this is because our explanations handle the rational aspects of belief without tackling the emotional aspects.

I could explain more but honestly James Clear has done a far better job here: https://jamesclear.com/why-facts-dont-change-minds