News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gitlab phished its own work-from-home staff, and 1 in 5 f... by pbowyer on Saturday May 23, 2020 @09:30AM (#23282769)
>> Also how do you as an attacker know that it was user not a e-mail server checking those images?

> Agent signatures.

Can you Expand? Googling isn't helping me understand what this means/how it works.

Re:Gitlab phished its own work-from-home staff, and 1 in 5 f... by chrisseaton on Saturday May 23, 2020 @09:41AM (#23282856)
Also called agent fingerprinting. You can look at exactly how the agent is responding and make educated guesses at what agent it is. You think one HTTP request looks like any other, but there's enough little bits of information here and there to leak info.

The user agent is the simplest example. That can be spoofed, but there's more subtle traces as well, all the way down the stack https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCP/IP_stack_fingerprinting.

Re:Gitlab phished its own work-from-home staff, and 1 in 5 f... by pbowyer on Monday May 25, 2020 @04:51PM (#23304828)
Thanks!
Re:Gitlab phished its own work-from-home staff, and 1 in 5 f... by eganist on Saturday May 23, 2020 @09:41AM (#23282853)
The "user agent string" of the email client is different from that of the user's browser.