Re:To show how easy it is for plagiarized news sites to get ...
by bufferoverflow on Friday May 22, 2020 @04:17PM
(#23276457)
Doesn't say how much she made from it. Guess: very close to zero, if not zero.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:To show how easy it is for plagiarized news sites to get ...
by robocat on Friday May 22, 2020 @10:40PM
(#23279365)
She did say: “I didn’t want to be taking ad revenue from legitimate advertisers, so I only briefly activated advertisements from the partners to see what surfaced and to take a few screenshots.”
Re:To show how easy it is for plagiarized news sites to get ...
by benburleson on Friday May 22, 2020 @04:34PM
(#23276623)
Including hosting? I'm sure it's actually in red.
Re:To show how easy it is for plagiarized news sites to get ...
by xwdv on Friday May 22, 2020 @10:39PM
(#23279354)
If you include the hit to your professional reputation from actually plagiarizing a news site for revenue and getting blacklisted from the industry, then what did it cost? Everything.
Re:To show how easy it is for plagiarized news sites to get ...
by waheoo on Saturday May 23, 2020 @02:24AM
(#23280435)
Or you get placed as a cto with a fat raise.
Re:To show how easy it is for plagiarized news sites to get ...
by xwdv on Saturday May 23, 2020 @11:33PM
(#23288856)
My dream job.
Re:To show how easy it is for plagiarized news sites to get ...
by Supermancho on Friday May 22, 2020 @09:13PM
(#23278901)
I'm not. I knew a developer who, in his spare time, developed a clever scraper. He scraped the top stories and results from Google, then scraped similar content based on Google's own ranking, then submitted that content to his own aggregator sites (all resolving to the same server). He ran ads on it. He got plenty of traffic and was net <$500/month in 2006.
It's not that expensive to run a site and the right advertising partners (cough Taboola cough) pay nicely.