Re:Goals and Priorities for C++
by gok on Thursday May 21, 2020 @11:02PM
(#23268297)
The first paragraph for the ABI non-goal section attacks a bunch of straw men about why a stable ABI is bad, then the second paragraph says they would actually be ok with doing what people actually want when they say they want a stable ABI.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Goals and Priorities for C++
by InfiniteRand on Friday May 22, 2020 @07:19AM
(#23270860)
My read this is a matter of not wanting to be forced into maintaining a stable ABI vs admitting that a stable ABI is good and useful and encouraging other people to handle it.
Less charitably, it is saying, yes stable ABI is good but it is not our problem.