Re:YouTube removes interview with professor of medicine on C...
by cfmcdonald on Thursday May 21, 2020 @04:26PM
(#23264653)
YouTube is perceived as a family-friendly, PG to PG-13 brand. It would be a very different, and much more niche, environment if it were a free-for-all of pornography, obscene language and graphic violence.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:YouTube removes interview with professor of medicine on C...
by the_af on Thursday May 21, 2020 @04:39PM
(#23264864)
I agree, but notice that except for pornography, which I forgot to include, I covered all of the others (sort of) with "hate speech". Banning violence/insults/pornography/harassment is an obviously useful filter for a PG-13 site, but I don't think it qualifies as curation. To me curation implies something related to the selection of quality.