Re:Organ transplants down as stay-at-home rules reduce fatal...
by yazboo on Thursday May 21, 2020 @11:48AM
(#23259875)
But isn't the issue here that both points of view are fact/information-based?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Organ transplants down as stay-at-home rules reduce fatal...
by Sharlin on Thursday May 21, 2020 @11:55AM
(#23259983)
Lies, damned lies, and statistics [1]. You can cherry-pick a piece of stats to support any opinion.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lies,_damned_lies,_and_statist...
Re:Organ transplants down as stay-at-home rules reduce fatal...
by pchristensen on Thursday May 21, 2020 @12:00PM
(#23260080)
“Safer” is an opinion or analysis. “There are fewer fatal car accidents overall” and “There are more Fatal accidents per mile driven.” are facts.
Re:Organ transplants down as stay-at-home rules reduce fatal...
by brenden2 on Thursday May 21, 2020 @11:49AM
(#23259886)
Yes, but what people pay attention to are the conclusions, not the facts.
Re:Organ transplants down as stay-at-home rules reduce fatal...
by SketchySeaBeast on Thursday May 21, 2020 @11:57AM
(#23260021)
But those are both facts - less people are driving, but if you do drive you're more likely to be in an accident. Are those conclusions? Would a presentation of facts just be the data itself?
Re:Organ transplants down as stay-at-home rules reduce fatal...
by sokoloff on Thursday May 21, 2020 @12:00PM
(#23260079)
Are you more likely to be in an accident? Or are you more likely to be in an accident with a fatality?
It seems like heavy rush-hour traffic is prone to creating a large number of accidents with a low total number of fatalities. When I drive around now, I believe the risk of accident per mile is significantly lower (city dweller used to typically packed city roads), but due to higher speeds, I can’t make the same claim about lower fatality risk.