News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Microsoft takes on Netlify, Vercel with static web app pu... by qppo on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @03:05PM (#23250507)
Is there a better link to the product and its features instead of a tutorial?
Re:Microsoft takes on Netlify, Vercel with static web app pu... by lanekelly on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @03:12PM (#23250580)
Re:Microsoft takes on Netlify, Vercel with static web app pu... by aloukissas on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @03:10PM (#23250562)
This is the one I found, sorry :/ But it looks like pretty close feature parity with Netlify and Vercel.
Re:Microsoft takes on Netlify, Vercel with static web app pu... by type0 on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @04:44PM (#23251556)
You shouldn't editorialize the title like you did.

If sctb or dang see this thread and could change it -

Static Web Apps from Azure https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/app-service/stati... would certainly be a better description.

Re:Microsoft takes on Netlify, Vercel with static web app pu... by aloukissas on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:19PM (#23251917)
Why shouldn't one do that? I found this to be the best description and I used it. Isn't this the way forums work?
Re:Microsoft takes on Netlify, Vercel with static web app pu... by type0 on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:54PM (#23252365)
It could very well be the best description, title mentions names of 2 companies. Why not other? You see it becomes to pedantic to fast when everyone puts their own title after their liking.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

"Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize. "

Re:Microsoft takes on Netlify, Vercel with static web app pu... by aloukissas on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @07:42PM (#23253344)
Gotcha! Wasn't really aware of this.
Re:Microsoft takes on Netlify, Vercel with static web app pu... by brutal_chaos_ on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @09:05PM (#23253842)
Could this be "geocities" anew?
Re:Microsoft takes on Netlify, Vercel with static web app pu... by throwawaysea on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @03:01PM (#23250469)
Seems like more big company crowding into niches innovated on by smaller players because they can't come up with innovation of their own. We need new antitrust laws to prevent the degree of capital and labor accumulation that hinder innovation and sustained healthy competition.
Re:Microsoft takes on Netlify, Vercel with static web app pu... by CraftThatBlock on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @10:21PM (#23254243)
Seems like most companies have one of these, including Google (Firebase Hosting + Functions). It seems like a common platform, however I always have trouble imagining what is the use case, especially in scalability (Function/Lambda is fine for small projects, but feels like it's not widely scalable and still has a lot or limitations)
Re:Microsoft takes on Netlify, Vercel with static web app pu... by aloukissas on Thursday May 21, 2020 @02:55PM (#23263226)
The best way to think about lambda at scale is as "glue layer" that is a way to call your backend (e.g. on GCP/AWS). But as you're getting started, you can just do all the functionality on serverless, w/o dealing with deploys, etc.
Re:Microsoft takes on Netlify, Vercel with static web app pu... by CraftThatBlock on Thursday May 21, 2020 @03:19PM (#23263601)
What would be the benefits vs hitting your API directly? (Having a "normal" API server)
Re:Microsoft takes on Netlify, Vercel with static web app pu... by curryst on Friday May 22, 2020 @12:00PM (#23273484)
It has some value add features, like authentication that you don't have to handle. It's also an autoscaling API layer if all it needs to do is query several of your backend services. It's probably less useful if you have a monolithic app so all the requests are just passed through, unless you use a lot of the value adds.

I'm not a Lambda expert though, there might be things I missed.