News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DirectX is coming to the Windows Subsystem for Linux by ori_b on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @08:47AM (#23246227)
> For me systemd based systems allow me to have declarative, portable unit files where init scripts don't.

Portable to what?

Re:DirectX is coming to the Windows Subsystem for Linux by Valmar on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @09:08AM (#23246393)
Portable to other systemd-using Linux distros.

sysv init scripts simply weren't portable between distros, leading to tons of non-standard, incompatible fragmentation.

Users simply couldn't simply take their own scripts over to another distro and expect them to just work, given said differences.

With systemd, unit files will simply just work between all systemd distros, given the standardized format.

Re:DirectX is coming to the Windows Subsystem for Linux by ori_b on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @09:17AM (#23246464)
Oh. That hasn't been my experience. Where did they standardize the names and set of the services you can depend on?
Re:DirectX is coming to the Windows Subsystem for Linux by majewsky on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @03:01PM (#23250468)
If the names of dependencies are the only unportable thing, we have indeed come a long way.
Re:DirectX is coming to the Windows Subsystem for Linux by AsyncAwait on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @09:51AM (#23246749)
> Where did they standardize the names and set of the services you can depend on?

You're ignoring what the parent said and talking past.

It's not the 'sets' that are standardized, it's the set of commands that are applicable to a systemd service and to any systemd Linux distro that is.