News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Old bills in Yemen are worth 10% more than new ones. Parent comment

Re:Old bills in Yemen are worth 10% more than new ones by cwmma on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @03:34PM (#23239141)
honestly the more HN comment is somebody complaining that it does redirect http to https because <long rant about certificate issuers> and then somebody brings up lets encrypt and then it degrades into a big argument until eventually somebody brings up SWJs at which point that person lost the argument.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Old bills in Yemen are worth 10% more than new ones by jhhh on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @06:12PM (#23240918)
Maybe the second most HN comment is running argument simulations? This one is even complete with a base case (SJWs) that is self-ending because you yourself brought it up. Saved us the trouble.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Old bills in Yemen are worth 10% more than new ones by perl4ever on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @08:51PM (#23242178)
No, they said SWJ, the journal dedicated to intrastate conflicts.[1] Not to be confused with the WSJ.

[1]https://smallwarsjournal.com/

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Old bills in Yemen are worth 10% more than new ones by beervirus on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @07:20PM (#23241488)
I'm mostly just happy that the site works fine with Javascript disabled.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Old bills in Yemen are worth 10% more than new ones by saagarjha on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @08:29PM (#23242029)
No, not this again…
[ Parent | on HN ]