Re:Ask HN: Production Lisp in 2020?
by nojito on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @11:37AM
(#23236026)
There was nothing special about the language chosen for viaweb. It was more the ability to understand what their endusers wanted better than their competitors.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
If their competitors were writing their applications in C++ or Perl, it probably would have made a noticeable difference to their iteration speed. Writing a web application in C++ (especially in 1995) would not have been too efficient.
I'm sure that they had a good understanding of their customers, but the language had to have made a difference as well. These days, we're writing web apps in languages like JavaScript and Ruby, not C++, so the difference would be a lot less significant.
Knowledge of the customer and programming ability is the most important driver of success.
The idea that LISP was a secret sauce for viaweb does not hold up under scrutiny.
If you have access to lexisnexis to lookup news articles from the era, it’s easy to see that.
Re:Ask HN: Production Lisp in 2020?
by oalae5niMiel7qu on Thursday May 21, 2020 @04:58AM
(#23256260)
Google is known to write a lot of their web apps in Java, which is very similar to C++.