News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Production Lisp in 2020? by nojito on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @11:37AM (#23236026)
There was nothing special about the language chosen for viaweb. It was more the ability to understand what their endusers wanted better than their competitors.
Re:Ask HN: Production Lisp in 2020? by snazz on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @11:43AM (#23236100)
If their competitors were writing their applications in C++ or Perl, it probably would have made a noticeable difference to their iteration speed. Writing a web application in C++ (especially in 1995) would not have been too efficient.

I'm sure that they had a good understanding of their customers, but the language had to have made a difference as well. These days, we're writing web apps in languages like JavaScript and Ruby, not C++, so the difference would be a lot less significant.

Re:Ask HN: Production Lisp in 2020? by nojito on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @02:52PM (#23238628)
Knowledge of the customer and programming ability is the most important driver of success.

The idea that LISP was a secret sauce for viaweb does not hold up under scrutiny.

If you have access to lexisnexis to lookup news articles from the era, it’s easy to see that.

Re:Ask HN: Production Lisp in 2020? by oalae5niMiel7qu on Thursday May 21, 2020 @04:58AM (#23256260)
Google is known to write a lot of their web apps in Java, which is very similar to C++.