Re:Vermont proposes providing broadband internet service to ...
by nekbroadband on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @11:36AM
(#23236009)
We're currently fighting to get this definition changed to 100/100 symmetrical, because as you say this magic number of 25/3 lets DSL in the door, which in turn means incumbent providers can continue to get federal dollars that they will refuse to spend on infrastructure. Telcos will claim their ancient 50 year old copper is capable of delivering 25/3 to an area, when in fact only the first 5 houses on a road get near that number. If you happen to be the 12th house down the road (about a mile out) you get 7/1 on a good day because the copper was strung in the late 1950s. The minimum standard having a symmetric speed requirement prevents small diameter copper from stealing money from the pot.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Vermont proposes providing broadband internet service to ...
by treis on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @09:12PM
(#23242295)
>We're currently fighting to get this definition changed to 100/100 symmetrical
TIL I don't have high speed internet.
Re:Vermont proposes providing broadband internet service to ...
by 3fe9a03ccd14ca5 on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @01:08AM
(#23243466)
I don’t think anyone except fiber providers are offering more than 10 mbps upload.
Because piracy is an existential problem for Comcast (owner of NBCUniversial among others) there’s incentive to keep upload SLOW.
And don’t get me started on bandwidth caps. I remember doing the math and realizing I could hit my bandwidth cap in 8 minutes if my internet went the full theoretical speed.
Re:Vermont proposes providing broadband internet service to ...
by 3fe9a03ccd14ca5 on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @01:09AM
(#23243471)
Who is “we” and how can I help?