News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Production Lisp in 2020? by nojito on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @07:21AM (#23233628)
Or the simpler reason is that they just knew LISP better than other languages and chose to use it.

Once they needed to grow by adding developers, they decided to rewrite into a language that other people already knew.

The only "Super Power" is the complete understanding of what your endusers want so that you can grow.

Re:Ask HN: Production Lisp in 2020? by gowld on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @10:53AM (#23235496)
When you are writing a tiny protoype 15 years ago, any language you know is fine. But over time -- both the life of the product, and the world overall, software grows far more complex and the ecosystem matters much more.
Re:Ask HN: Production Lisp in 2020? by cornishpixels on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @09:59AM (#23234925)
Knowledgeable developers are part of every language's ecosystem.
Re:Ask HN: Production Lisp in 2020? by nojito on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @10:20AM (#23235130)
Yes but ease of attracting developers is harder in some languages versus others.

No need to include the "knowledgeable" modifier.

Re:Ask HN: Production Lisp in 2020? by p_l on Thursday May 21, 2020 @03:51PM (#23264096)
Interestingly I have encountered voices that using "elitist" language like Common Lisp, OCaml or Haskell combined with widening recruitment pool (by going globally distributed) actually increased some companies abilities to hire experienced developers - because it filtered popular languages that suffered from higher number of people who had higher opinion of their skills than warranted - or who just wanted to "fake it till you make it", especially after boot camps became popular.