News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Technology that changed air travel by moeffju on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @02:50AM (#23232022)
I was wondering about the time zones mentioned in the article?

If SFO/T-7 is 7 hours behind Greenwich Mean Time and LHR is in the (same) GMT time zone, how is that 8 hours ahead of the origin airport?

Re:Technology that changed air travel by vinay427 on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @03:37AM (#23232269)
It's really poorly phrased in the article but I assume what they meant is that LHR is in a time zone that sometimes observes GMT, and otherwise observes BST (British Summer Time) in the summer which is 8 hours ahead.

It's not exactly correct that SFO is 7 hours behind GMT because this isn't true for around half the year. It also isn't exactly true that LHR is in GMT.

Most of the year, SFO is actually 8 hours behind LHR. A few weeks are off due to different DST dates.

Re:Technology that changed air travel by PuddleOfSausage on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @06:02AM (#23233148)
The author/editor has mentioned elsewhere in this thread that he was using dummy data (which contains mistakes). For this dummy December flight LHR would be in GMT (UTC+0) and not BST (UTC+1).
Re:Technology that changed air travel by fraculus on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @03:37AM (#23232273)
GMT doesn't observe summertime, but LHR does. So LHR (and the rest of Britain) is only in the GMT time zone for half the year.
Re:Technology that changed air travel by azalemeth on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @12:03PM (#23236371)
GMT is very nearly the same thing as UTC. Think of it as a reference rather than timezone, but one that happens to be used by a few places half the time.

It's just easier to think of yourself in UTC/GMT all the time (known as Zulu time or /Z in the aviation world) and deal with the relative offsets later. Don't forget that US Daylight Saving has different start/end dates to the UK while you're at it too...