Introducing StackLayout: a flexible width, component based CSS layout system

Posted by dools on Monday March 14, 2011 @11:06AM
from the stacklayout.com dept.

http://www.stacklayout.com/

( 7 comments | 7 points | on HN )

Re:Introducing StackLayout: a flexible width, component base... by xd on Monday March 14, 2011 @11:08AM (#2322756)

The domain you have linked to doesn't seem to exist ..

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing StackLayout: a flexible width, component base... by dools on Monday March 14, 2011 @11:13AM (#2322777)

Works for me, what are you seeing?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing StackLayout: a flexible width, component base... by xd on Monday March 14, 2011 @11:20AM (#2322811)

Working now. I'm guessing you recently setup the domain/dns?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing StackLayout: a flexible width, component base... by dools on Monday March 14, 2011 @11:21AM (#2322817)

yep, not long ago (ps sorry can't reply to your comment directly)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing StackLayout: a flexible width, component base... by k7n4n5t3w4rt on Monday March 14, 2011 @05:19PM (#2324557)

So, you can use vertical-align:middle? that seems pretty good. Looks definitely worth a try.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing StackLayout: a flexible width, component base... by dools on Monday March 14, 2011 @09:02PM (#2325338)

Yes indeed. The DOCTYPE is important here. A Transitional DOCTYPE will not render vertical-align correctly, it renders all declarations as vertical-align:top. That is why i have chosen <!DOCTYPE html> which renders vertical-align correctly and also validates target="_blank" on <a>nchor nodes.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing StackLayout: a flexible width, component base... by camslizzle on Monday March 14, 2011 @10:18PM (#2325527)

hey, camslice here. that last comment was actually from me. i was SOMEhow logged in as dools

[ Parent | on HN ]