Re:AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review: Why Is This Amazon's Best Sellin...
by ben-schaaf on Monday May 18, 2020 @01:03PM
(#23225099)
A 3600 may have much worse memory latency, but it's also got more than twice the cache of a 9900k. At least according to the linus tech tips review, the 3700x beats the 9900k in CSGO, a horrendously single-threaded, cpu limited game.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review: Why Is This Amazon's Best Sellin...
by blattimwind on Monday May 18, 2020 @01:11PM
(#23225237)
I don't think CSGO provides much insight, considering that its engine was already outdated for many years on release (2012) and has received few significant updates since. The 3rd party benchmark map that is typically used for these tests does not reflect actual gameplay well. You'll notice that in the benchmark the game is running quite smoothly, meanwhile in actual games CSGO has been plagued by horrid microstuttering and poor framepacing for years (largely caused by the ever-increasing amount of skins and swappable models).
Games like SOTTR provide much better insight into the performance characteristics of modern engines instead of 2004 tech, both in CPU and GPU limited scenarios (depending on settings).
Re:AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review: Why Is This Amazon's Best Sellin...
by ben-schaaf on Monday May 18, 2020 @09:31PM
(#23230401)
You specifically said:
> What it does mean is in CPU limited scenarios Ryzen CPUs currently cannot touch Intel's CPUs.
CSGO, regardless of how old the engine is, is very much a CPU limited title, and not only do Ryzen CPUs "touch" Intel in CSGO, they beat it.
In SOTTR the 3600 is about on par with a 9600k: https://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreviews/3489-amd-ryzen-5-3600-...