Re:AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review: Why Is This Amazon's Best Sellin...
by Causality1 on Monday May 18, 2020 @12:57PM
(#23224993)
Native gaming isn't particularly cpu-bound these days. I wish I could take the overall performance of a 3700 and divide it between four cores instead of eight. IPC is king when it comes to game console emulation.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review: Why Is This Amazon's Best Sellin...
by mywittyname on Monday May 18, 2020 @01:09PM
(#23225207)
That same review has an overclocked i5-9600K vs a stock one and the performance difference is pretty large. An i5-9600K @ 5.0 is almost as significant of an improvement over a stock one as a stock i5-9600K is over the lowest performing CPU of the bunch.
Re:AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review: Why Is This Amazon's Best Sellin...
by Causality1 on Monday May 18, 2020 @03:38PM
(#23227378)
What percentage of 9600Ks can hit that OC and keep stable under load?
Re:AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review: Why Is This Amazon's Best Sellin...
by blattimwind on Monday May 18, 2020 @08:24PM
(#23229966)
~90 %
Re:AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review: Why Is This Amazon's Best Sellin...
by Yizahi on Monday May 18, 2020 @01:30PM
(#23225519)
Bulldozer series were that - 4,6,8 normal cores which could have been glued in pairs to make double wide cores (this also produced a metric ton of comments and articles how FX series "weren't really 8 (6,4) cores"). CPUs were good enough but apparently this architecture was hard to utilize fully (and had other issues, e.g. with IPC).