News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Another Explosion at Fukushima Nuclear Plant. Parent comment

Re:Another Explosion at Fukushima Nuclear Plant by mseebach on Monday March 14, 2011 @01:49AM (#2321467)
If you allow meltdown, you're looking at contaminating the entire reactor building. Clean up costs would be astronomical. If the pressure vessel remains intact, the whole thing can be lifted out with little effort, leaving an uncontaminated building behind.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Another Explosion at Fukushima Nuclear Plant by mrleinad on Monday March 14, 2011 @01:52AM (#2321474)
Why? Isn't the "last line of defense" prepared to avoid any contamination at all?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Another Explosion at Fukushima Nuclear Plant by mseebach on Monday March 14, 2011 @05:42AM (#2321870)
Yes, of the surrounding environment. This is a single building more or less single-purpose-build to be contaminated as a last measure.

All these exercises are inherently economical -- they could just have walked away on the first day and have the whole thing melt down, and the surrounding area wouldn't have been any better or worse off, radiation-wise.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Another Explosion at Fukushima Nuclear Plant by Ratfish on Monday March 14, 2011 @03:28AM (#2321650)
As I understand it, spreading out the waste leads to more material being contaminated. Surrounding concrete, pipes, cranes beams etc... Most equipment used ends up contaminated. I know an engineer who cleans these places up, and its mad, bad and very very expensive. Massive amounts of planning for simple jobs. Plotting safe routs, zones, dose rates etc. Maximum containment makes the job way way easier.
[ Parent | on HN ]