News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California officials reject subsidies for SpaceX over Tes... by dimator on Saturday May 16, 2020 @08:53PM (#23208446)
By that rationale, no one should have been forced to stay home. Everyone's got mouths to feed.
Re:California officials reject subsidies for SpaceX over Tes... by proc0 on Sunday May 17, 2020 @01:43AM (#23209854)
Yeah that's what Sweden did.
Re:California officials reject subsidies for SpaceX over Tes... by testbot123 on Sunday May 17, 2020 @12:02PM (#23212850)
The place with universal healthcare?
Re:California officials reject subsidies for SpaceX over Tes... by proc0 on Sunday May 17, 2020 @01:15PM (#23213409)
Not quarantining doesn't require universal healthcare.
Re:California officials reject subsidies for SpaceX over Tes... by dgzl on Saturday May 16, 2020 @09:14PM (#23208583)
Using the other rationale, driving puts others at risk and we shouldn't be in the road until driving is perfectly safe.
Re:California officials reject subsidies for SpaceX over Tes... by jackguy on Saturday May 16, 2020 @11:02PM (#23209173)
But driving requires a person to be above a certain age. They have to go through a test to prove they're competent. And there's still certain rules to follow like not being intoxicated while driving even after they have proved themselves to be competent.

And most importantly driving is a privilege that can be taken away if someone repeatedly fails to comply with the rules. So not really a rational rationale

Re:California officials reject subsidies for SpaceX over Tes... by testbot123 on Sunday May 17, 2020 @12:03PM (#23212859)
How about "drunk driving puts others at risk and you shouldn't drive a car when you're drunk."