Re:Coronavirus: A third of hospital patients develop dangero...
by kaoD on Saturday May 16, 2020 @03:05PM
(#23206229)
> They’re in the bar graph, expressed as rates per 100k.
AFAICT that's per 100k total population, not per 100k infected (which amounts to 0.2% total FR citywide, not even IFR).
Or am I missing the graph you mean?
> The values cited by the OP (>>1.5%) are far too high, and based on severity-biased samples were gathered early in the pandemic.
I am OP. They're based on an antibody study currently ongoing in my country so... no, they're not far too high nor severity-biased. (I'm trying to find links in English, but no luck so far).
AFAICT that's per 100k total population, not per 100k infected (which amounts to 0.2% total FR citywide, not even IFR).
Or am I missing the graph you mean?
> The values cited by the OP (>>1.5%) are far too high, and based on severity-biased samples were gathered early in the pandemic.
I am OP. They're based on an antibody study currently ongoing in my country so... no, they're not far too high nor severity-biased. (I'm trying to find links in English, but no luck so far).