Re:Why is 70% isopropyl alcohol a better disinfectant than 9...
by smnrchrds on Saturday May 16, 2020 @12:14PM
(#23204671)
Wait until you hear about International Phonetic Alphabet.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why is 70% isopropyl alcohol a better disinfectant than 9...
by gumby on Saturday May 16, 2020 @12:33PM
(#23204889)
We need to expand the TLA space.
The only options I can think of are increasIng the number of letters and redefining “T” to “tetra” or even “thirty”.
Time to get started on a new RFC
Re:Why is 70% isopropyl alcohol a better disinfectant than 9...
by Sharlin on Saturday May 16, 2020 @01:10PM
(#23205202)
ETLAs got you covered:
https://wiki.c2.com/?ExtendedThreeLetterAcronym
Although I'd like to see something like XTLAs, for eXtensible Three Letter Acronyms.
Re:Why is 70% isopropyl alcohol a better disinfectant than 9...
by mkr-hn on Saturday May 16, 2020 @12:53PM
(#23205070)
You can never have too many The Last Airbender spinoffs.
Re:Why is 70% isopropyl alcohol a better disinfectant than 9...
by foolmeonce on Saturday May 16, 2020 @01:19PM
(#23205293)
I guess I'm still not getting TLA, since my Temporal Logic of Actions model says there should only be 17 valid spinoff states.
Re:Why is 70% isopropyl alcohol a better disinfectant than 9...
by jfk13 on Saturday May 16, 2020 @05:40PM
(#23207424)
Have you checked out the Unicode character repertoire recently? There are a lot more than 26 letters to play with.
Re:Why is 70% isopropyl alcohol a better disinfectant than 9...
by gumby on Saturday May 16, 2020 @11:18PM
(#23209279)
We have to restrict outprselves to phonetic alphabets, abjads, and abugidas else they can’t truly be “acronyms”
Re:Why is 70% isopropyl alcohol a better disinfectant than 9...
by stickfigure on Saturday May 16, 2020 @12:51PM
(#23205054)
Perhaps consider a FLAX?
Four letter acronym, experimental.