Re:A small restaurant owner on Google, DoorDash, and Grubhub
by pbhjpbhj on Friday May 15, 2020 @05:30PM
(#23197692)
FWIW the measure of trademark infringement is balance of probability, as it's civil law. So that would probably be the best way to combat it. Damages are probably less.
Re:A small restaurant owner on Google, DoorDash, and Grubhub
by jklein11 on Friday May 15, 2020 @08:57PM
(#23199394)
Looking at the ad[1] that Saddleback put in their article, I can't possibly see what would warrant incompetence, let alone false advertising or fraud.
How is this any different than a newspaper ad saying "You can get Coke at Krogers" and then Krogers having a Pepsi display in the soda aisle.
1. https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/6KsGyAeFFfeliOLsLJzPQf5o1o...
Re:A small restaurant owner on Google, DoorDash, and Grubhub
by Judgmentality on Friday May 15, 2020 @09:38PM
(#23199665)
Because clicking on a link is different from reading a poster. I think we just have to agree to disagree.
Re:A small restaurant owner on Google, DoorDash, and Grubhub
by jklein11 on Saturday May 16, 2020 @12:16PM
(#23204697)
I'm sorry I'm not trying to be obtuse here. I would genuinely like to understand your point of view.
I'm not sure if you were the one who downvoted me here but it hardly seems fair to downvote someone for having a different point of view.
Fraud is hard to prove because you have to prove intent, but this at best incompetence, almost assuredly false advertising, and pretty clearly fraud although good luck proving it in court.