In the "two people walking towards each other" case, I've battled that my whole life. I typically stare right at the other person, anxiously waiting for them to pick a direction so I can go the other way.
My wife pointed out to me that just by picking a side, and then looking in that direction as the other person comes towards you, that they (possibly unconsciously) go the other way, and conflict avoided! Mind blown. And it works.
Re:Weakening Cycles So That Turing Can Halt
by Xophmeister on Friday May 15, 2020 @07:54AM
(#23191096)
Another solution I've heard for this problem is to not look the other person in the eye and just look passed/through them without faltering. IIRC, this comes across as an assertion of dominance and the other party will submit and move aside. I don't actually know if this works :P Also, I assume there's a hilarious edge case where two super-assertive people just walk into each other.
Re:Weakening Cycles So That Turing Can Halt
by heavenlyblue on Friday May 15, 2020 @08:56AM
(#23191611)
Or you could just say that this is an assertion of “I am intelligent enough to pick the path I would like to go given the fact that the choice of a path is irrelevant for both of us”.
The fact that you lack confidence doesn’t suddenly make others alpha fe/males.
Re:Weakening Cycles So That Turing Can Halt
by FartyMcFarter on Friday May 15, 2020 @07:52AM
(#23191082)
I think this is called a livelock.
I've noticed similar things at traffic junctions; roundabouts and single-lane roads, especially. Personally, I sometimes do this when I go to open a door that is often, but not always, locked: my hand will reach for the latch, then go for the handle, then back and forth semi-automatically, until my higher thinking kicks in and I realise I've just got to make a decision!
In these cases, I feel as though the cycles aren't weakened, but instead there's some kind of executive function -- that's normally asleep, because it's presumably expensive to run -- which oversees to break the impasse, when needed.