News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down stay-at-home order t... by Fjolsvith on Thursday May 14, 2020 @12:31PM (#23181574)
> Is that fair to someone you then infect out in public?

Why is it that for all of history this hasn't been an issue for infectious diseases until now?

Re:Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down stay-at-home order t... by vkou on Thursday May 14, 2020 @12:33PM (#23181596)
It has, in fact, been an issue, which is why epidemic laws have been drafted, in the past, to control that behaviour.
Re:Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down stay-at-home order t... by Gibbon1 on Thursday May 14, 2020 @03:02PM (#23183879)
It's funny you have no clue that the state used to run Tuberculosis sanitariums. Hint the imates didn't have a choice. New York had a sanitarium where they sent people with infectious diseases unless they had a physician to vouch for their care. Public health authorities would quarantine families for scarlet fever. They'd put as a red notice on your door.

All perfectly legal.

Re:Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down stay-at-home order t... by Fjolsvith on Wednesday May 27, 2020 @07:34PM (#23331497)
Quarantine is where you restrict the movement of sick people.

Tyranny is where you restrict the movement of healthy people.

Re:Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down stay-at-home order t... by Fjolsvith on Thursday May 14, 2020 @07:21PM (#23186846)
> All perfectly legal.

While the quarantine order in Wisconsin isn't.