News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:92 of top 500 subreddits controlled by same 5 people by jessaustin on Thursday May 14, 2020 @10:38AM (#23180083)
It serves the user; that's why the user is doing it. Whom the hell else should ever be served?

Dumb analogies are dumb. Carefully curating one's online content is in no way similar to "dropping the paper thrash on the street".

Re:92 of top 500 subreddits controlled by same 5 people by kristofferR on Thursday May 14, 2020 @10:41AM (#23180112)
It's very similar, you leave thrash around for others to deal with. And it's just not "one's online content", you also degrade the online content of the ones who spent time replying to you and participating in the thread.
Re:92 of top 500 subreddits controlled by same 5 people by fzeroracer on Thursday May 14, 2020 @08:00PM (#23187269)
I mean it's quite simple. It serves the user at the cost of the community at large.

HN has similar problems because you can edit your post after people have replied to it. This means you can retroactively change history and how prior arguments were framed, which can make other people look like idiots or completely destroy a comment chain.

If you're really concerned about anonymity or your history being used against you, then create throwaways. Otherwise you're not stopping corporations from keeping tabs on you, the moment you hit post that data's already been scraped and stored somewhere.