The logging framework isn't a bottleneck, and other lies your laptop tells you

Re:The logging framework isn't a bottleneck, and other lies ... by RNCTX on Thursday May 14, 2020 @05:56AM (#23177552)

Which begs the question: why is server rental so expensive, but for maintaining artificial scarcity for the sake of a cloud service's bottom line?

Cloud computing price is still based around (illegally monopolized and price fixed) memory prices, which is absurd because two load-balanced NVME disks are comparably as fast as DDR3 RAM.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The logging framework isn't a bottleneck, and other lies ... by bjonnh on Thursday May 14, 2020 @09:25AM (#23179195)

The throughout is fast but nvme drives have much more latency than RAM.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The logging framework isn't a bottleneck, and other lies ... by RNCTX on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @11:09AM (#23235670)

We're talking about remote internet-transversing applications. They all have network latency far in excess of any disk technology.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The logging framework isn't a bottleneck, and other lies ... by saurik on Thursday May 14, 2020 @06:44AM (#23177883)

Can you write and rewrite them over and over again thousands of times a second though without damaging them?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The logging framework isn't a bottleneck, and other lies ... by RNCTX on Tuesday May 19, 2020 @11:04AM (#23235610)

Samsung warranties them for 5 years.

DDR3 was 2007, DDR4 was 2014, DDR5 is supposed to be this year.

[ Parent | on HN ]