Re:Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down stay-at-home order t...
by DanBC on Thursday May 14, 2020 @05:46AM
(#23177501)
One is private to his home. It was the broadcasting that got him the conviction.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down stay-at-home order t...
by dgzl on Thursday May 14, 2020 @05:55AM
(#23177548)
I think I'm missing some context. Filming isn't the issue then, broadcasting is? Seems like another asterisk on supposed "rights" that exist in countries that pretend they have them.
Re:Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down stay-at-home order t...
by DanBC on Thursday May 14, 2020 @07:00AM
(#23178000)
An article 10 freedom of expression defence was available to him, and the judge even asked him to make that defence, but he and his legal team chose not to use a freedom of speech defence.