Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down stay-at-home order that closed businesses

Re:Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down stay-at-home order t... by jb775 on Thursday May 14, 2020 @02:37AM (#23176152)

That isn't what I said. I'm saying that coronavirus is being listed as the primary cause of death in bad-faith.

According to the CDC guidelines[1]: In cases where a definite diagnosis of COVID–19 cannot be made, but it is suspected or likely (e.g., the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty), it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate as “probable” or “presumed.”

My conclusion is based on the broadness of that statement alongside the fact that hospitals receive $13k-$39k per Covid death. Plus my wife works at a large hospital and I'm getting the inside-scoop.

[1] https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/vsrg/vsrg03-508.pdf

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down stay-at-home order t... by jacobush on Thursday May 14, 2020 @05:33AM (#23177418)

So you are saying every doctor reading that instruction is in bad faith writing "probable" when in fact, they don't actually think it's probable?

Or do say all doctors writing "probable" are actually deluded?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down stay-at-home order t... by asabjorn on Thursday May 14, 2020 @11:20AM (#23180581)

He is saying that as Dr Birx on the coronavirus task force says [1] the government classify all coronavirus patient deaths as ‘COVID-19’ deaths, regardless of cause.

This is due to a highly unusual CDC guideline that stipulates this, and it may mask collateral deaths due to lockdown measures that could be avoided if we like normal looked for the true cause.

The reason why this is relevant is that an overwhelming percentage of coronavirus deaths also had other serious health conditions.

[1] https://nypost.com/2020/04/07/feds-classify-all-coronavirus-...

[ Parent | on HN ]