Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame...
by rhizome on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @10:25PM
(#23174543)
Yes, yes, yes, yes, everybody. Right now on the NYT side there's a story about renewable resources being used more than coal. Great news, but is it more important than the government snarfing your browser history? A California congressional election? We have college students considering gap years, LA Times has a spurious Wuhan-interest story and a whole 1/3 sidebar dedicated to the death count.
There are plenty of stories being written, but not about this. Pretty much at all. That is the problem, and I don't know how assigning blame certain outlets would change that. We don't know if pitches are getting rejected, or the money is in other topics, or anything, but the simple fact is that it's not happening and it's something that affects everybody in the US (and beyond, I'm sure).
Looks like you're getting the usual HN anti-intellectual downvotes and my upvote wasn't enough to drag you out of the gray.
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame...
by taurath on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @09:51PM
(#23174288)
Its in the interest of every single person in america that has ever googled something they would prefer to not talk about.
It should be on the 5PM, 7PM and 11PM local news, and every cable org.
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame...
by ta17711771 on Thursday May 14, 2020 @03:19AM
(#23176428)
What companies are those channels owned by?
What media do you think should cover this? FOX News? CNN? MSNBC? Do you think Rachel Maddow should report on this? Who is going to report on this kind of stuff?