Re:Don’t require a user to be interested twice: lessons on r...
by DenisM on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @11:38AM
(#23167957)
What’s the harm? Depending on your functionality there is hardly any downside to allowing multiple ghost accounts.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Don’t require a user to be interested twice: lessons on r...
by jbay808 on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @11:43AM
(#23168020)
I used to run a forum for an indie videogame with a small but passionate userbase. Unfortunately it was completely overrun by spambots to the point that moderators couldn't keep up and they drowned out the real posts. We had to shut it down.
Re:Don’t require a user to be interested twice: lessons on r...
by RyJones on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @11:51AM
(#23168126)
This is one of the reasons Begg Knives shut down his forums. We literally couldn't delete accounts fast enough.
Re:Don’t require a user to be interested twice: lessons on r...
by ValentineC on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @06:58PM
(#23172857)
When I used to manage web forums, I ask a hard question during signup and put the answer within the question itself (e.g. "hint: the answer is xxx").
This usually stops simple spam bots that are aimed at that particular off-the-shelf forum software.
Re:Don’t require a user to be interested twice: lessons on r...
by AQuantized on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @12:09PM
(#23168351)
Why not stop allowing registration except by manual whitelist? At least until the spammer lost interest.
Re:Don’t require a user to be interested twice: lessons on r...
by detaro on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @12:26PM
(#23168559)
Is that less friction than captchas?
Re:Don’t require a user to be interested twice: lessons on r...
by duxup on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @12:33PM
(#23168630)
How would that work?
Manually approve someone who registers ... then discover they're a spam bot?
Re:Don’t require a user to be interested twice: lessons on r...
by the_af on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @11:47AM
(#23168082)
Anything with a chat/comments section will be overrun with spam-bots and be rendered unusable and unwelcoming. The difference between a bot-ridden comments section in a blog and a clean one is huge.
Re:Don’t require a user to be interested twice: lessons on r...
by jabroni_salad on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @11:49AM
(#23168092)
There are lists of companies with workflows like this that get used in spam campaigns. You can put any email address in and now they will get a signup notice and multiple 'hey you didnt complete our workflow!' marketing messages. Easy way to put a lot of useless messages that mostly pass spam checks in any mailbox you desire.
I recently had an incident with Chime Bank like this, where someone enrolled every public email address at my company with them. I sent them an abuse report and they told us to block their domains. Real great solution, guys.
Re:Don’t require a user to be interested twice: lessons on r...
by hef19898 on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @11:42AM
(#23168012)
True that! Had a discussion along that line just earlier today about the contact us function on my website. Worst case, I get some more mails in my spam folder. I can live with that, checking it every two weeks or so doesn't hurt.