Re:RISC-V OS using Rust: Filesystems
by Arnavion on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @09:05PM
(#23162233)
KB is kilobyte. KiB is kibibyte.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
> kibibyte
I wonder if anyone uses this abomination of a word in real life though.
Re:RISC-V OS using Rust: Filesystems
by a1369209993 on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @11:30PM
(#23163185)
Not that I know of; they're called kilobytes.
Re:RISC-V OS using Rust: Filesystems
by a1369209993 on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @09:26PM
(#23162378)
Yes, KB = kilobyte = 1024 byte.
At this point I can only assume I'm being trolled.
This whole thread is confusing to me as well. Isn't the whole point of a kibibyte to work in increments of 1024, unlike kilo, which is actually 1000, as defined by the sciences long ago?
So 1024 * 256 is 256 KiB by definition, since a Kibibyte is literally 1024 bytes, and the number of Kilobytes will by higher, since the number it represents is smaller.
Re:RISC-V OS using Rust: Filesystems
by GolDDranks on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @02:22AM
(#23164034)
Either user a1369209993 is unaware of the distinction ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibibyte ) or then they are deliberately ignoring it (My guess: to defend the old definition of kilobyte = 1024 bytes) to the point that their messages look like trolling.
Reality will forcibly catch up with them when they try to buy a new harddrive.
Re:RISC-V OS using Rust: Filesystems
by pavehawk2007 on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @10:07AM
(#23166999)
That's what I thought. I really only care about how much "stuff" I can store in a block, which is 1,024 bytes. If that's 1KiB or 1.024KBs, the distinction isn't worth that much brainpower.