News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:America’s Havana: Thousands Say “Ciao” to San Francisco by bhupy on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @08:02PM (#23161694)
The inflow for immigrants is attributed to the fact that SF is a gateway city, and doesn't really tell us much about SF's quality of life.

> The discrepancy between international and domestic migration in the Bay Area can likely be explained by what economists call "gateway cities." These cities, often planted along the coast, serve as entry points for foreigners moving to the U.S. The immigrants will register in the gateway city, but often move to other parts of California or the country within months, according to Phuong Nguyen, a research specialist at the California Department of Finance.

And while it might be statistically "insignificant" in the absolute, you have to look at how it compares to other cities to really understand how healthy that number is. A contrast: the net domestic migration of Sacramento County was +15,224. -2500 looks far less healthy next to that.

Re:America’s Havana: Thousands Say “Ciao” to San Francisco by hellisothers on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @12:11AM (#23163395)
“Santa Clara and San Mateo counties grew by 46,048 and 16,727 people respectively, but they had negative net migration totals for domestic residents, at -99,374 and -20,960”.

That’s way more than -2,500, maybe you should have written articles about those counties.

Re:America’s Havana: Thousands Say “Ciao” to San Francisco by bhupy on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @11:00AM (#23167511)
1) I didn't write the article

2) If your argument is that Santa Clara and San Mateo counties are also bad (if not worse), I don't disagree...