News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Less is exponentially more (2012). Parent comment

Re:Less is exponentially more (2012) by AnimalMuppet on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @02:20PM (#23157602)
Sure, they're looking for new languages to play with. They're not looking for new languages to write major projects in, though. You write major projects in languages that you have already fiddled in, and the fiddling has given you confidence that they're up to the task. Nobody (sane) sees a publicity blurb and decides to bet a major project on it.

Don't confuse "they came to a different conclusion than me" with "they're sheep".

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Less is exponentially more (2012) by sl1ck731 on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @02:53PM (#23158093)
I mean cargo culting tech and languages is practically a meme at this point in tech. I'm not sure I can scientifically argue that its widespread but I think it is equally futile to argue that it does not happen frequently.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Less is exponentially more (2012) by AnimalMuppet on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @03:16PM (#23158411)
Does it happen? Sure. More often than it should? Absolutely.

Often enough to account for the popularity of Go? I strongly doubt it. It could have accounted for Go's popularity in the first year or two. But now, Go has been used by too many people to do too many things. Go's popularity now is based on its ability to help you get things done, not on Google's name.

[ Parent | on HN ]