Re:Twitter Will Allow Employees to Work at Home Forever
by ashtonkem on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @01:48PM
(#23157119)
The utility of partial WFH is much, much lower than full WFH. With partial WFH I still have to live within reasonable commuting distance from the office, while if I’m full WFH I can leverage the difference in cost of living away from the office.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Twitter Will Allow Employees to Work at Home Forever
by wan23 on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @02:44PM
(#23157957)
I would consider a much longer commute to be acceptable once or twice a week compared to having to do it every day. You could still have the benefit of having a lower cost of living without increasing the number of hours you spend commuting per week.
Re:Twitter Will Allow Employees to Work at Home Forever
by ashtonkem on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @05:00PM
(#23159762)
I wouldn’t say that partial WFH is of no benefit, but it’s of significantly lower benefit. If I’m coming to the office once a week, I still have to live in a ~1 hr ring around my office. If I’m full WFH I can live anywhere.
The former opens up more options, but it only opens up a tiny percentage of the options that the latter creates.
Re:Twitter Will Allow Employees to Work at Home Forever
by sean-duffy on Thursday May 14, 2020 @12:26PM
(#23181492)
I guess it depends on the invidual. Personally if I only had to do it once a week I would be fine with a 2 hour commute. Small price to pay for actually being able to own my own home.
Re:Twitter Will Allow Employees to Work at Home Forever
by bigwavedave on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @04:51PM
(#23159599)
Absolutely. I have a 90 minute commute but I only have to do it one day out of five. For me, I couldn't be happier.