News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Racket is 25 by bjoli on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @02:41AM (#23151130)
I agree! I solved it by implementing mostly-racket-compatible for loops for guile scheme. Since then I can't not think of for loops as recursive macros :)

Edit: the loops actually got more powerful recently: The for/foldr was a great addition where you can replace most non-tail-recursive functions with it, even though I probably wouldn't use it for tree transversal :)

There are no comments on this comment yet.